Direct casting types don't have to be strictly related I have declare an object that i need to cast or convert to customer class type It comes in all types of flavors
Casting Process Rheinmetall/HUAYU JV Develops New Casting Process
Usually a new object is created
Copy and information might be lost
Change reference type, otherwise throws exception. Regarding use for casting, you still see the need for it in some libraries Had you been doing just double x = a;, you can do away with the explicit conversion since an int is implicitly converted to a double (live example). Do you understand the concept of casting
Casting is the process of type conversion, which is in java very common because its a statically typed language Casting has sense only for a variable (= chunk of memory whose content can change) there are no variables whose content can change, in python There are only objects, that aren't contained in something They have per se existence
Then, the type of an object can't change, afaik
Then, casting has no sense in python That's my believing and opinion Correct me if i am wrong, please 'casting' with reflection asked 16 years, 1 month ago modified 4 years, 6 months ago viewed 65k times
The real question is what you want to do when/if the value in the unsigned int it out of the range that can be represented by a signed int If it's in range, just assign it and you're done If it's out of range, that'll give an unspecified result so you'll probably want to reduce it the right range first, or assign it to a larger signed type. I am working on.net core application
