If, on the other hand, they are distinct individuals, then this parenthetical note in genesis 46:10 indicates that the translators of the nrsv likely made the correct translation. Acts 13:9 appears to record the moment saul's name changes to paul Shaul is indeed a hebrew name, and the hebrew alphabet does indeed have a letter denoting the sound sh
Shaul Guerrero to step away from wrestling - Diva Dirt
Greek and latin, however, do not, and the new testament was written in greek, not in hebrew
Hence, shaul became saul, which is not a translation, but a transliteration, just as jesus is also a transliteration, this time of the hebrew joshua.
While king saul, on the hunt for david, was relieving himself in a cave, some of david's men, also in the cave, encouraged david to kill him 1 samuel 24:4 then the men of david said to him, “this. The Hebrew says: וְאֶת־חֲמֵ֗שֶׁת בְּנֵי֙ מִיכַ֣ל בַּת־שָׁא֔וּל אֲשֶׁ֥ר יָלְדָ֛ה לְעַדְרִיאֵ֥ל בֶּן־בַּרְזִלַּ֖י הַמְּחֹלָתִֽי My translation: and the five sons that Michal daughter of Shaul bore. There seems to be a contradiction is scriptures
And saul said, they have brought them from the amalekites For the people spared the best of the sheep and of the oxen, to I’ve wondered this as well It seems like david was a much worse king if you look at the 2 kings’ body of work as a whole
Why is it that saul’s disobedience was dealt with so quickly and harshly and david’s was not?
1 the [niv] is an incorrect translation * urim & thummim are not mentioned King saul appeared to have had a "born again" 9 when he turned his back to leave samuel, god gave him another heart
And all these signs came to pass that day 24 tahath his son, uriel his son, uzziah his son, and shaul his son 25 the sons of elkanah Amasai and ahimoth, 26 elkanah his son, zophai his son, nahath his son, 27 eliab his son, jeroham his son, elkanah his son
28 the sons of samuel
Joel his firstborn, the second abijah
