He keeps telling me that chess.com is harder and has more players and more serious players, therefore the games are harde. Here is what i mean to test I've watched a couple of games where people play against stockfish level 8 on lichess, and they pretty much lose all the time
Shirlene Agata / shirleneagata Nude OnlyFans Photo #1 – The Fappening Plus
Is it possible for someone to beat a level 8 computer in any time betw.
I think those users are using engines when the position is complicated but playing a fair game the rest of the game
That might evitate them to be catched and allow them to play at a 1500 level while they are poor players that should have a rating <1500. 0 lichess has a play with the computer option on its main site, which offers stockfish levels 1 through 8 What would their fide elos be with time control set to 5+3? Unterforum für herausforderungen + ankündigung von online partien auf lichess subforum for challenges + announcement of online games on lichess
3 i often come across chess commentary mentioning phrases like this is just a weak browser engine, let's see what the proper engine says. as far as i understand, lichess's browser engine is essentially the same as stockfish, albeit potentially slightly slower due to browser architecture Can someone confirm if my understanding is accurate? I wonder if there has been a test to compare connectivity to the major chess websites Or whether it is easy to run such a test myself if needed
