And as i am spending and hour or so a day on chess now, i figure the subscription is worth it for me Lichess has a stronger average player base, you will always have a way higher percentile on chess.com (although they do measure activity differently, but it is still very much the case). Lichess is better than chess.com without a subscription
MuscleMami / jennawellnessbb / mvsclemami Nude OnlyFans Photo #12
Chess.com (diamond sub) is better than lichess for me.
Lichess desktop app out now
Free and easy to use i have a lot of tabs open in my browsers (yes, browser s) and i want lichess to have a special place on my computer That's why i packaged lichess.org into a desktop app for linux and windows Feel free to download your version It is free of charge of course.
So i usually play on lichess now a days while my friend plays on chess.com He keeps telling me that chess.com is harder and has more players and more serious players, therefore the games are harde. I've watched a couple of games where people play against stockfish level 8 on lichess, and they pretty much lose all the time Is it possible for someone to beat a level 8 computer in any time betw.
A place to discuss the wonderful chess site of lichess.org!
You can paste your pgn here, and analyse just as you would a game you played on lichess So how does one use the engine to improve I recently saw in a comment thread on another post that one person talked about how they found lichess analysis beginner unfriendly Let's try to dispel that notion
The feature is, after all, meant for beginners. Lichess has better players on average, which shouldn't surprise anyone since chess.com has the better domain name, more marketing, and way more people The people who play on lichess likely started elsewhere like chess.com then made the switch.
