I also hate the 2352 or whatever different models gibson sells. I believe that the sg neck has possibly changed more than any other gibson The longer the notes last, the bigger will be the differences
Video tagged with sg xmmm, xmm, xmm leaks – @lolosgwnker on Tumblr
An sg's tone decays faster and will sound thinner compared to that of les paul guitars
These provide more sustain and an overall rounder tone than sgs.
The 2013 sg standards and originals are awesome sgs Absolutely one of my favorites Other than the smaller headstock and crown placement of the standard, they are a clone of the previous years '61 ri To my guess charlie brown, the bevel police officer of the board, would say that the sg 61 shape is the very one for sgs
Two of my sgs have different body and neck contours, two have the 61 shape, and the differences are truly significant Nashville), and platings (nickel vs. 2013 was magical, for gibson sg's I bought 3, that year, and my first one, in 40 years, in december of 2012.which was the '61 sg reissue satin finish
I have no regrets, whatsoever, making any of those purchases
2012 satin reissue '61 sg 2013 sg original w/maestro vibrola kirk douglass signature sg custom w/maestro les paul tribute sg w/sideways vibrola they all sound. I'm seriously considering an 2018 sg standard hp What do the dip switches do How effective are they, meaning are they even worth considering them as a positive addition?
Immediately after, i also played a newer gibson sg standard in the store The overly light weight of the sg's body, the lack of density and focus in the tone, lack of mid/upper mid snap, and much slower resonance in the neck/body left me feeling disappointed with the feel. The sg neck shape has been evolving since its introduction in 61
