Proponents of the king james only movement insist that the king james version (kjv) is the only legitimate english translation of scripture and that none others are valid What should we think about the kjv only movement Proponents of the king james only movement have belonged to a variety of ecclesiastical fellowships.
King & Taylor Foden - COACHBUILD.com
The kjv only movement claims that the king james version is the only reliable and inspired translation of the bible
However, this article argues that this position is based on loyalty to the kjv itself, not to the original languages or the textus receptus
It also suggests that the kjv should be updated and that other translations can be useful. What is king james onlyism It’s actually a new idea from the 20th century, long after the king james bible was published in 1611 This movement gained traction mainly in u.s
It stirred quite a bit of debate along the way So, what are the key claims of kjv onlyists These tenets have triggered the “kjv only” debate This article will look at both sides of this argument, first the objections to the “king james only” side, and second, supporting arguments for the “kjv only” position.
