They are both alkalines, and i hear they are the exact same thing, other than that industrials are used in work places like hosipitials, and such Though at 1.5a loads i tested at, through ten tests, showed the energizer slightly on top, maybe it was just the age of the cells in both your tests and mine So what makes them more special than regular energizer max alkalines
Energizer Batteries leak battery acid after 42 minutes of use - YouTube
The energizer 2500 have the knack of loosing their charge very quickly, both in the device and just laying around (self discharge)
Energizer ultimate lithium aa official specifications (the second part of the specification is from datasheet)
Last up to 9x longer in digital cameras (versus energizer® max® Results vary by camera.), which means 9x less waste weigh 1/3 less than standard alkaline batteries perform in. I thought it might be useful/handy to combine the information from those threads (mostly manufacture/brand specific) into one thread As the title states, i just have a quick question about how lithium primary cells like the much hyped energizer ulitimate lithiums compare to a high quality nimh
For example, the specs for the olight i3e keychain light lists runtimes of *35 minutes at 120 lumens on one alkaline aaa. I just picked up a new set of energizer 2500mah aa batteries I've had them for a few years, but don't remember.
Energizer's own literature clearly states the e91 are alkaline
Ah, you're right, i'm thinking of l91s Which makes even less sense, because why would you use the product code for a common alkaline battery? You'd think detector designers would make it a point to keep things simple for the end user. A largish rectangular lantern with a fold out stand and fold out light panel.
Here is an energizer and surefire photo
