In short, she/they is the most common way for a person to indicate that they go by she/her or they/them pronouns, likely with a preference for the former If joan is the person who answered the phone, should she say this is her or this is she? Taken from the free online dictionary
shebestephanie biography, Wikipedia | she be Stephanie bio, wiki | she
In a 1989 article from the los angeles times, for instance, writer dan sullivan notes, what's wrong with reinventing the wheel?
She was in on the drama when the conman showed up at the stage door
If you are an actor in something, it's in She was in cat on a hot tin roof She was in the movie cat on a hot tin roof She was in several west end plays
Versus to be on tv to be on the radio to be on tv or the radio just means that a person has been recorded in that medium. The difference is that she's and similar shortened forms are used in colloquial speech, but not in certain cases In your example, she is being emphasised. The at is redundant
It is not needed because the questions could be more concisely put as where is she/he?
This redundancy, and the efforts of seventeenth and eighteenth century grammarians to align english with latin, lead some people to say it is ungrammatical to end with at . So as grammarians do you think the contracted form of she has should be she 's More importantly, are there rules for contracting words Say, if i wanted to express she was as a contraction could it also be she 's or she's
You can't have she did knew or she does knows The likeliest explanation is a typo If it were an esoteric english dialect, it should have been evident from the character's dialogue before and after I'm presently reading a semantics book written by a linguist and published by mit
I've counted three typos in the fist three chapters.
Upon answering the telephone, the person calling asks if joan is available
