Just ask them how they wish to be addressed Post hoc is currently about as common in ngrams, but more common in google search results That guarantees that you won't address them in a way contrary to their own preferences.
Ex Machina poster - Alicia Vikander poster, Oscar Issac, Ex Machina movie poster | eBay
Does ex have a full form
Google dictionary has this information about the origin of ex
In writing, though, the use of former doesn't seem so rare Whichever rule you choose and stick to, you'll be swimming against the linguistic tide with much of your text! Ex by itself (no hyphen) doesn't seem right either Can each part be hyphenated, or the hyphen dropped altogether
Is there another way to make this more clear while still keeping the ex prefix? — could it be that the wind banged the door shut — this can become a possibility only if there was a sufficiently strong wind that day, and if the corridor pulls in strong enough draughts — (after two phone calls) this can be possible
It was windy and the caretaker confirms that the wind in the corridor can at times bang the doors.
Which is the correct way to tell where i'm working I'm working in xyz company I'm working for xyz company I'm working at xyz company
Or is there any difference in the meaning? Post facto is almost always part of ex post facto
