A friend claims that the phrase for free is incorrect The economic concept is free rider Should we only say at no cost instead?
Free Fire 推出全新 Logo！台灣限定聯名活動即將登場 | XFastest News
' free ' absolutely means 'free from any sorts constraints or controls
The context determines its different denotations, if any, as in 'free press', 'fee speech', 'free stuff' etc.
What is the opposite of free as in free of charge (when we speak about prices) We can add not for negation, but i am looking for a single word. Confusingly, in the uk, they are known as public schools. My company gives out free promotional items with the company name on it
Is this stuff called company swag or schwag It seems that both come up as common usages—google searching indicates that the I don't think there's any difference in meaning, although free of charges is much less common than free of charge Regarding your second question about context
Given that english normally likes to adopt the shortest phrasing possible, the longer form free of charge can be used as a means of drawing attention to the lack of demand for.
I want to make a official call and ask the other person whether he is free or not at that particular time I think asking, “are you free now?” does't sound formal So, are there any alternatives to.
