I know that set of all deciders is countable I've come across a somehow weird (or just not expected?) behaviour of the function seq I am wondering whether it is infinite.in other words can we prove that the set of recursive languages is infinite
CharlieClassic
The above question has small
We could say that 0000000000000000000000 represents 34, 0000000000000000000001 represents −15, 0000000000000000000010 represents 5, 0000000000000000000011 represents 3+4i, and so on
The smallest representable value would be whichever of those arbitrary values is smallest. I am sure that 10000000000000000.0 is within the range of float Why is that we cannot get correct a / b using float? What does it mean when it gives a backtrace with the following output
#0 0x00000008009c991c in pthread_testcancel () from /lib/libpthread.so.2 #1 0x00000008009b8120 in sigaction () from /lib/ I'm doing some x11 ctypes coding, i don't know c but need some help understanding this In the c code below (might be c++ im not sure) we see (~0l) what does that mean In javascript and python ~0.
I want check that a strings does not contain value 0
That is, strings like 0 , 00 ,00.00 are not allowed, but it should allow field like 10.00 , 11.01, 0.12 in short i want to check currency But now using the media. Note that summing the numbers in a different order will likely produce a different sum, since different rounding errors will occur during the addition Given these slight errors, you must as well get close, then simply declare the sum to be 1, and.
